My daughter showed me an article* on Saturday and suggested
I read it. The story was about a Hollywood producer who flew on an airplane on
Thanksgiving with a rude passenger and his response to her.
He overheard her rude, entitled comments to the flight
attendant and he began live tweeting what was happening to his thousands of
followers (see, this is what happens when the FAA changes their electronic
devices rule). Eventually, his live tweets began including photographs of notes
that he wrote and had delivered to her. Then he tweeted her responses. The
woman became so angry that when they got off the plane, she slapped him. Flight
security offered to call the police, but he refused. His followers on Twitter
have declared him a hero. He then took to Tumblr to explain the reasons for
actions and why he wasn’t a hero.
When my daughter showed me the articles, I laughed. I have
to admit, the live tweets were pretty funny. And I appreciated his stance in his
follow-up article where he explained that he was not a hero and that service
people should never have to take the kind of abuse to which the flight
attendant was subjected.
But once I got past the first laugh, my opinions changed.
What the producer did was wrong. Social media makes it very
easy to get caught up in what you’re doing, to feed off the reactions of
others, and to think that you’re bringing a wrong to light. It also makes it
easy to cross a line.
It’s one thing to live tweet something anonymously: “There’s
a woman doing x.” We all do it and the anonymity makes it okay. It’s
humiliating, however, to make it personal. By showing the notes that went back
and forth between the producer and the woman, he made it personal.
The woman was a bully. There is no doubt that verbally
abusing a flight attendant and blaming him or her personally for ruining
Thanksgiving is wrong. But bullies feed on anger. Anger drives them to behave
the way they do, and other people’s anger rarely stops them. Kindness kills
them. People united against a bully stops them. If he really felt the need to
write her a note, he could have shown compassion and still rebuked her for her
actions.
For that matter, if he really felt the need to engage, he
could have directed his time and energy to supporting the flight attendant.
Instead, he put the flight attendant in the awkward position of delivering the
notes, something that the flight attendant eventually refused to do.
When the flight security people offered to call the police,
he refused. I don’t know why, but I suspect that if he had asked the police to
get involved, he may have gotten cited for harassment. Because he did harass
the woman, no matter how rude she may have been. He might be smart enough to
outwit her, but all he’s done is moved the bullying from the verbal field to a
social media one. His intentions are good, but his methods are not. He’s not
diffusing the situation. He’s certainly not helping it. He’s pumping the top
and letting it spin where it may.
Two wrongs do not make a right, no matter what he may think.
*I’ve deliberately refrained from linking to the articles or
by mentioning his Twitter handle. If you’re that interested in reading them,
I’m sure you can find them on your own (hint: check out Huffington Post
Parents).
I read about it this weekend also, and I was totally on board with him until he started with the crude "suck my d$#k" notes. That ruined his credibility in my eyes with what he was sharing. Had he taken the high road and she was still as awful as she was, that wouldhave been different. But we'll never know.
ReplyDeleteI know. There was so much potential for him to do good, and he lost it all.
Delete3 wrongs. He made the whole thing up. It never happened. He fabricated the whole thing.
ReplyDeleteReally??? So he wasn't even creative enough to make something up that actually made him look good, rather than like an idiot?
Delete